KUMIKO Intelligence Products · Corporate Performance
Guided pilot programme

Understand how your company is really performing — and why.

Corporate Performance connects financial, earnings, procurement, operational and commercial perspectives into an evidence-based management view. It examines what has changed, which causes can be supported by evidence and where management attention is required. Missing evidence, assumptions and limitations remain visible — so decisions are not based on a plausible guess.

Managing director of an industrial SME reviewing an illustrative concept for KUMIKO Corporate PerformanceIllustrative concept · synthetic data · not product interface
The starting point

The numbers exist.
The explanation often does not.

In many industrial SMEs, the decisive information is spread across ERP, finance, cost accounting and Excel. Reports show results, but rarely the robust relationships behind them.

Corporate Performance addresses precisely that gap: the questions left unresolved between the monthly close, controlling, procurement, sales and operational performance — yet still requiring a management decision.

Management view

The questions behind
the numbers.

Corporate Performance starts with the management question, not with a dashboard.

01

How is my company really performing?

Which conclusions about earnings, economic performance and development are supported by the available evidence?

02

What changed — and why?

Which changes can be explained, which causes remain hypotheses and what evidence is missing?

03

Where is economic value being created or lost?

Which customer, product, procurement, cost, operational or commercial effects matter to performance?

04

What requires my attention?

Which issues are material enough to warrant a management decision or further investigation?

05

Which decision or action has the greatest leverage?

Which options follow from the supported situation — without transferring decision authority to the system?

06

What do we not yet know?

Which data gaps, assumptions or methodological limitations prevent a robust conclusion?

07

What was decided — and what happened afterwards?

Where the evidence allows, Corporate Performance can place decisions and observed economic developments in a traceable context.

The decisive difference

What the data cannot prove is not polished into an answer.

This synthetic example shows the analytical logic. It is not a product interface and contains no customer data.

SYNTHETIC EXAMPLE · METHOD LOGICNOT PRODUCT UI
Management questionWhy did margin fall by 2.1 percentage points?
01 · SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE

Price and volume effect

The conclusion is linked to approved revenue, price and volume data and to the calculation applied.

STATUS · SUPPORTED
02 · NOT YET DETERMINABLE

Material usage effect

The valid BOM version is missing. The system therefore produces neither a substitute value nor a plausible causal story.

STATUS · EVIDENCE PENDING
Evidence requiredApproved BOM and actual consumption data
What Corporate Performance connects

From company condition
to management decision.

Each pilot has a clearly bounded analytical scope. Every conclusion remains linked to its data basis, calculation, data quality and methodological limitations.

01

Financial Truth

Establish a robust basis for the financial position and relevant earnings measures.

02

Profitability

Understand where earnings are generated and how customers, products, projects or other relevant views contribute.

03

Procurement & Supply Chain

Examine procurement and supply-chain developments while distinguishing them from economic effects that have not yet been robustly established.

04

Operations & Delivery

Place operational performance, capacity, utilisation and delivery-related changes into management context.

05

Commercial Excellence

Examine price, volume, mix and other commercial developments systematically and connect them to their evidence.

06

Integrated Management View

Bring relevant findings together, make priorities and missing evidence visible and structure the basis for management decisions.

Executive Cockpit

Not more data.
A clearer management view.

The Corporate Performance Cockpit brings relevant findings, changes, evidence status and management attention into one view. Its purpose is not to display every available metric, but to make visible what changed, what can be robustly explained and where a decision or additional evidence is required.

Conclusions remain connected to their evidence status. An open question remains open when the basis for a robust answer is missing.

Engagement models

For a specific decision.
Or for ongoing management.

01

Corporate Performance Assessment

Examine a specific management situation in depth.

For strategic assessments, transactions, due diligence, restructuring or other clearly bounded decision situations. Corporate Performance structures the management question, connects relevant evidence and makes findings, uncertainties and decision requirements visible.

02

Corporate Performance Management

Reassess company performance as new periods become available.

For recurring management steering, for example after a new monthly or reporting-period close. New information is placed into the existing performance context, changes are examined and relevant management attention is updated.

The value

Not another
black box.

Corporate Performance replaces neither management nor the accountable functions. The system investigates, explains and structures options for action. Decisions, approvals and accountability remain with the responsible people.

01

Create clarity faster

See where earnings are generated and which customers, products or projects are economically critical.

02

See causes, not symptoms

Trace margin movements back to price, volume, mix, material, cost or utilisation.

03

Make decisions more robust

Expose data gaps, assumptions and methodological limitations before they become a management action.

04

Reduce analytical effort

Investigate recurring relationships systematically instead of creating another Excel version for every question.

EVIDENCETraceable

Material conclusions remain linked to their data source and calculation.

METHODReproducible

The same approved basis is expected to produce the same calculated conclusion.

CONTROLHuman-led

The system investigates and recommends. Accountable people decide and approve.

BOUNDARIESNot forced

When the evidence is insufficient, the result remains explicitly open.

Guided pilot programme

Start with one clear question.

A pilot starts with one clearly bounded management question. This may concern an earnings or profitability development, a procurement or operational change, or a commercial performance question. Which areas can actually be examined depends on the mandate, available evidence and approved data scope.

Scope, data coverage, security requirements, methodology and expected decision value are agreed before work begins. Steffen Kuhn leads the engagement for KUMIKO and remains accountable for customer coordination and human approvals.

Current status: guided pilot programme. There is not yet a reference application using live company data. Company data is processed only within an explicitly approved mandate and after the required technical, contractual and data-related approvals.